I don’t know that today’s installment of New Covers For Old 2021 contains any true backward steps, but there are some definitely bewildering lateral substitutions.
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
Category - New Covers For Old
I gotta tell you: Every year when I prep New Covers For Old, going through all the Amazon links, finding all of the books that have been de-published (or republished with a different URL), I get really really familiar with the Dogs of Amazon.
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
There’s only one day left to vote in the second round of the first annual Lousies awards. Don’t let democracy pass you by!
In today’s installment of New Covers For Old 2021, there are waaay too many covers splitting the difference between “incremental change” and “doubling down.”
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
The time draws near. Make your voice heard in the second round of voting for the first annual Lousies awards!
In today’s installment of New Covers For Old 2021, almost everything is an improvement. But still, very few of these covers reach the level of “good.” I guess that’s too high a bar to expect.
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
Lousiness is in the eye of the beholder. Let us know what your eye sees in the second round of voting for the first annual Lousies awards!
In today’s installment of New Covers For Old 2021, we discover that upgrading your cover to “mediocre” can we quite an improvement if your original cover was just so danged bad.
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |