It’s a testament to how atrocious a cover can be when there’s a clear improvement in the new cover, and it’s STILL lousy enough to appear on this site.
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  Updated Cover with a new title |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  Updated Cover with a revised title and byline |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
There are several in this batch that can only be described as “doubling down.”
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  Updated Cover with a revised title |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
At least one of these is so much worse, it’s stunning.
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  Updated Cover with a new surname |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  Updated Cover with a new surname |
  |
  |
When you see it, you will facepalm SO HARD.
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
Warning: There are some sucker-punches in here.
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
[Again, a random wittiness.]
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
[Insert witty comment here.]
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
We’ve got at least one new cover here that’s a definite step backward from the original. I’ll let you discover it for yourself.
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
