I don’t know that today’s installment of New Covers For Old 2021 contains any true backward steps, but there are some definitely bewildering lateral substitutions.
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
Not necessarily transforming it for the better. (And, there are two typos in the Amazon title.)
| Should this cover be in the Lousies? |
You’ve voted, you’ve waited, you’ve held rallies and protested in the streets… and now the results of the vote are finally upon us! Behold the Top Ten Worst Covers Posted in 2020!
I gotta tell you: Every year when I prep New Covers For Old, going through all the Amazon links, finding all of the books that have been de-published (or republished with a different URL), I get really really familiar with the Dogs of Amazon.
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
Apostasy! The Word-Faith Doctrinal Deception
How to make sure people take your doctrinal thesis seriously:
#1 Don’t do this.
| Should this cover be in the Lousies? |
There’s only one day left to vote in the second round of the first annual Lousies awards. Don’t let democracy pass you by!
In today’s installment of New Covers For Old 2021, there are waaay too many covers splitting the difference between “incremental change” and “doubling down.”
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
Splurge Dealers & Banshee Addicts
And the award for largest ampersand goes to…
| Should this cover be in the Lousies? |