Backwater

cover[1]

Backwater

You know, this kinda worked — until someone came along and said, “No! What it needs is to list the sub-subgenre in Comic Sans!”

Spread the love
10 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Kris
Kris
9 years ago

*slaps forehead* So close…

Karl
9 years ago

Yeah, the graphic and title font have kind of a Ralph Steadman vibe going on. But then… just when you’re least expecting it… Oh, the horror, the horror!

Sue
Sue
9 years ago

Three different fonts and they’re all bad. And the art is horrible–I can’t even tell what it is. What is it? Looks low res too.

invader
invader
9 years ago

I want to say that is a very poorly drawn voodoo doll, and a skeleton hand with a possible shoulder blade. Though with the way it is distorted I think they were trying to do a above and below the water level look.

LydiaFCG
LydiaFCG
9 years ago

I like the art, but not as cover art. It’s not the kind of thing you paint if you want people to understand it.

James F. Brown
James F. Brown
9 years ago

I feel sorry for the Gingerbread Man. šŸ™

Tia
Tia
9 years ago

The art is cool, though for a book cover you probably shouldn’t use something better suited to a psychological “what do you see?” test.

I see the St. Louis Arch blowing up, and a skeleton hand grabbing a policeman voodoo doll.

Sirona
9 years ago

Hmmm…I love the title font and the overall grunginess of the art, but it’s too indistinct. And, yeah, it looks like a little policeman voodoo doll. Just ain’t right.

LydiaFCG
LydiaFCG
9 years ago
Reply to  Sirona

I agree. Title font is good. Art doesn’t belong on a book cover, unless its a book about art.

john e. . .
9 years ago

My problem (other than the psychological kinds) is with the hand. Three fingers? And is that thumb upside down and backwards, or just fucked up?