Big Bad Mooney

cover[1]

Big Bad Mooney

Well, at least the light sources are technically on the same side…

Spread the love
19 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Catie
Catie
8 years ago

What is a Mooney? Is that the giant transparent creature in the background?

Hitch
8 years ago
Reply to  Catie

Well, Catie:

It seems that there’s a big bad Mooney, a less bad Mooney, and a girl, mooning over…well, somebody.

This cover amply demonstrates the issues surrounding green covers. All too clearly.

Catie
Catie
8 years ago
Reply to  Hitch

Plot twist: that’s not a girl. If I understood the blurb correctly, there are three gay men that form a love triangle, and two more that contemplate forming a love triangle. To quote the blurb: Five men contemplate the question…How many in a life or a bedroom is too much?

Hitch
8 years ago
Reply to  Catie

Geeeeze. A 5-way? (I have some thoughts that I won’t spill here, as they would be HIGHLY inappropriate for a family-friendly website.)

That dude looks like a girl. Period.

Catie
Catie
8 years ago
Reply to  Hitch

I think it’s only three way, but still. I’m not sure how they would be split, though. I know first three make a triangle, and second two make a couple, I just don’t know who’s the third guy for the couple. One of the first three, or a sixth guy? It almost makes me want to read to find out, but I hate it when an author doesn’t put a comma before calling someone by name (“Lets eat grandma.”), which makes reading it out of the question.

Candy Kong
Candy Kong
8 years ago
Reply to  Catie

I think it’s the Sean Penn impersonator in the front

Catie
Catie
8 years ago
Reply to  Candy Kong

So, it’s a person? Not a species of bird or, I don’t know, an airplane? That’s one mystery solved. Now if we could solve an even greater mystery of how anyone can think this is a passable book cover.

Candy Kong
Candy Kong
8 years ago
Reply to  Catie

To be fair this isn’t eye-burningly bad
I don’t think anything could be as bad as Flesheaters

Catie
Catie
8 years ago
Reply to  Candy Kong

True, true. But if we start using that one as a measure, this site is going to get a lot less updates, because it’s not easy to find a cover that is that bad ;D

Emm
Emm
8 years ago
Reply to  Catie

Yeah, it’s not fair to measure anything by Flesheaters, that’s about the base of the barrel.
Although this one comes pretty close:
http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/9369461-marked

Catie
Catie
8 years ago
Reply to  Emm

Rawr XD

Submit it. There’s a submit button at the top 😀

Emm
Emm
8 years ago
Reply to  Catie

I did. I don’t know if he’s seen it yet though

Catie
Catie
8 years ago
Reply to  Emm

You’ll get a reply 🙂

Emm
Emm
8 years ago
Reply to  Catie

The worst part of that cover is it’s supposed to be erotica.
O_O

Catie
Catie
8 years ago
Reply to  Emm

Interesting, there’s also an edition with much better cover https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/25748332-marked . Don’t know why they don’t remove the lousy one.

Emm
Emm
8 years ago
Reply to  Catie

Yeah WTF, that cover’s about a squillion times better. About 98% of the reviews rated it down a star because of having to see the nasty old cover on their shelf, it seems like they’d want to prevent that more. :/

Catie
Catie
8 years ago
Reply to  Catie

The good one has a different publisher. Unless the publisher simply rebranded, I would guess the author moved to a new house that makes better covers. Most of his covers published by Torquere Press are rather underwhelming.

Emm
Emm
8 years ago

Marvin K Mooney will you please go now!

Grackle
Grackle
8 years ago
Reply to  Emm

Been a long time since I thought of that book–thank you!