Yes, let’s just dispense with a for-real title in favor of a granular description of the sub-sub-subgenre.
| Should this cover be in the Lousies? |
Yes, let’s just dispense with a for-real title in favor of a granular description of the sub-sub-subgenre.
| Should this cover be in the Lousies? |
I don’t suppose that the author could fit the word smutt in there a few more times?
Nothing gets a reader ‘in the mood’ for sexy reading like a ridiculously long book title, where the words stop making sense once you try to parse them into one coherent statement.
Also, did anyone notice “Erotca” is a pretty obvious typo?
This is what I get for not reading the fine print.