Once Bitten Twice Mad: Part One

oncebitten

Once Bitten Twice Mad: Part One

Not just Papyrus, italicized Papyrus! But maybe the cover for Part Two is better?

oncebitten2

In a word, no.

Spread the love
12 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Naaman Brown
Naaman Brown
9 years ago

“America 1887 Times have changed.” Human rabies plague. Sounds worse than 1877 (Indian wars, coalfield wars, railroad strikes, Edison’s phonograph).

Cover elements: blood splatter, guy in cowboy gear, five guys out standing in a field, diesel train. Diesel train in 1887? Was the plague brought to 1887 by a time traveling diesel train? Is it so hard to look up sepia toned photos of 1887 era trains?

DED
DED
9 years ago
Reply to  Naaman Brown

And the time traveling diesel train brought people wearing t-shirts.

red
red
9 years ago

The airplane-shaped cloud with red puppie-dog eyes and snot-dripping nose totally steals the cover. I can’t wait for P art 3.

EricL
EricL
9 years ago

I think what was bitten was a ketchup-drenched burger and it squirted all over your covers, but don’t get mad. Just wipe it off.

Catie
Catie
9 years ago

Lol.

BTW, on part two, Sturgill is right on the man’s crotch, in case you couldn’t see it.

Naaman Brown
Naaman Brown
9 years ago
Reply to  Catie

At 25% close to thumbnail size Part 2 reads “by Nicole”. Black letters on red background = illegible.
Why can’t authors/publishers look at the cover full size, then thumbnail, before approving it?

Catie
Catie
9 years ago
Reply to  Naaman Brown

Personally I think it’s better you can’t see it, since it is on the guy’s crotch after all. Not only was the designer too lazy to make another cover, it couldn’t even be bothered to move the byline to a more visible and appropriate position. Assuming the author is the designer, who’d put their own name on someone’s crotch?

Take Cover
Take Cover
9 years ago

Woulda worked better if they’d rotated it 180 instead of just flipping it.

Naaman Brown
Naaman Brown
9 years ago

Just curious. Are stock photos with faceless models cheaper than stock photos showing the model’s face?

Viergacht
Viergacht
9 years ago
Reply to  Naaman Brown

I haven’t noticed them being more expensive, but it’s very trendy now to obscure faces.

James F. Brown
James F. Brown
9 years ago

Hey, looky, everybody! I just learned how to use Photoshop’s “mirror image” function!

Pretty cool, eh? I can just make one cover and use it TWICE! 🙂

L-Plate Pen
L-Plate Pen
9 years ago

So… if it’s ‘Once Bitten Twice Mad Part Two,’ does that mean it’s actually twice bitten four times mad?