Many solid improvements today, but yes, there’s another one whose “improvement” is solely the correction of a typo. If it’s a flaw that I would cite to judtify posting the cover, how could I not acknowledge its correction?
Category - New Covers For Old
The same as every year, what really stuns me are all the covers that WEREN’T replaced…
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Yes, some of these are only infinitesimal improvements, but some of the others are full steps backwards, okay?
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
The scale tips to the positive in today’s assortment, and we’ll take what we can get.
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
There are a few good improvements here, and a couple that will make you chuckle, trust me.
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |















































































