Dude: you mean an IMAGE of the cover, on some surface or the other–look at the shadows and the edges. Un-freaking-believable. What’s worse is that the first cover is so bloody AWFUL. I had to look twice, because the first time, I thought his damn head was on backwards.
The inside top flap on my scanner is uniform flat black, still my amateur butt usually crops scanned images just to save disk storage. It’s just a few seconds of effort.
NegCrit: When reduced to thumbnail size with that grey scanner flap border, the title and author are illegible.
PosRein (strain): No oval moons or photobombing wolfies.
Karl
8 years ago
Is it not caring, or is it actively wanting to inflict pain on anyone foolish enough to look at this pickled abomination of a “cover”?
Dude: you mean an IMAGE of the cover, on some surface or the other–look at the shadows and the edges. Un-freaking-believable. What’s worse is that the first cover is so bloody AWFUL. I had to look twice, because the first time, I thought his damn head was on backwards.
The ultimate in not caring.
But…if he got the image on the cover of the paperback, that means he has that image somewhere and could have just used that picture…my head hurts.
It’s the Web 0.1 strategy of cover design.
Wow. Way to “Show You Care … Not”.
The inside top flap on my scanner is uniform flat black, still my amateur butt usually crops scanned images just to save disk storage. It’s just a few seconds of effort.
NegCrit: When reduced to thumbnail size with that grey scanner flap border, the title and author are illegible.
PosRein (strain): No oval moons or photobombing wolfies.
Is it not caring, or is it actively wanting to inflict pain on anyone foolish enough to look at this pickled abomination of a “cover”?