Backwater

cover[1]

Backwater

You know, this kinda worked — until someone came along and said, “No! What it needs is to list the sub-subgenre in Comic Sans!”

Spread the love
10 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Kris
Kris
10 years ago

*slaps forehead* So close…

Karl
Karl
10 years ago

Yeah, the graphic and title font have kind of a Ralph Steadman vibe going on. But then… just when you’re least expecting it… Oh, the horror, the horror!

Sue
Sue
10 years ago

Three different fonts and they’re all bad. And the art is horrible–I can’t even tell what it is. What is it? Looks low res too.

invader
invader
10 years ago

I want to say that is a very poorly drawn voodoo doll, and a skeleton hand with a possible shoulder blade. Though with the way it is distorted I think they were trying to do a above and below the water level look.

LydiaFCG
LydiaFCG
10 years ago

I like the art, but not as cover art. It’s not the kind of thing you paint if you want people to understand it.

James F. Brown
James F. Brown
10 years ago

I feel sorry for the Gingerbread Man. 🙁

Tia
Tia
10 years ago

The art is cool, though for a book cover you probably shouldn’t use something better suited to a psychological “what do you see?” test.

I see the St. Louis Arch blowing up, and a skeleton hand grabbing a policeman voodoo doll.

Sirona
10 years ago

Hmmm…I love the title font and the overall grunginess of the art, but it’s too indistinct. And, yeah, it looks like a little policeman voodoo doll. Just ain’t right.

LydiaFCG
LydiaFCG
10 years ago
Reply to  Sirona

I agree. Title font is good. Art doesn’t belong on a book cover, unless its a book about art.

john e. . .
10 years ago

My problem (other than the psychological kinds) is with the hand. Three fingers? And is that thumb upside down and backwards, or just fucked up?