Dear Francis,
It appears you have confused barbed wire with dragon. And made a crappy cover of it.
That is all.
SD
Kris
10 years ago
ARGGHHH – not those FONTS again! *ugh* ;p
Jim
10 years ago
The picture (which looks like it was photographed with an anamorphic lens) is pretty good, even if its relevance isn’t clear. And the title probably should have been put above or below the barbed wire.
Ha, I’m stupid; I didn’t see the “aspect ratio” tag, which explains the “anamorphic” effect.
Bruce
10 years ago
Not even a shadow of a dragon.
invader
10 years ago
Are dragons or the lack thereof becoming the new wolfie?
Nancy
10 years ago
Where’s the dragon? Oh, I get it – it’s somewhere beyond that barbed wire, but we’re not allowed to see it. That MUST be the reason!
Wow, and this is Volume 2? ::shudder::
L.
10 years ago
Silly humans. Apparently you’ve never heard of the incredibly rare Barbed Wire Dragon. I am in awe that the author was able to capture an image of critter.
Maybe it’s a closeup of the barbed wire fence at the Dragon Ranch.
Dear Francis,
It appears you have confused barbed wire with dragon. And made a crappy cover of it.
That is all.
SD
ARGGHHH – not those FONTS again! *ugh* ;p
The picture (which looks like it was photographed with an anamorphic lens) is pretty good, even if its relevance isn’t clear. And the title probably should have been put above or below the barbed wire.
Ha, I’m stupid; I didn’t see the “aspect ratio” tag, which explains the “anamorphic” effect.
Not even a shadow of a dragon.
Are dragons or the lack thereof becoming the new wolfie?
Where’s the dragon? Oh, I get it – it’s somewhere beyond that barbed wire, but we’re not allowed to see it. That MUST be the reason!
Wow, and this is Volume 2? ::shudder::
Silly humans. Apparently you’ve never heard of the incredibly rare Barbed Wire Dragon. I am in awe that the author was able to capture an image of critter.