On the upside, the author and illustrator’s names are more-or-less obscured by the boots. They’re related. See, that’s what you get for going to family functions. Hey, I could draw your next cover. Uh, yeah that would be…great.
Bruce
7 years ago
Explains the “is she going to eat me?” look in the horses eye.
Also – use of obscure awards. Among 50 great writers we should be reading? Okaaay….
On the upside, the author and illustrator’s names are more-or-less obscured by the boots. They’re related. See, that’s what you get for going to family functions. Hey, I could draw your next cover. Uh, yeah that would be…great.
Explains the “is she going to eat me?” look in the horses eye.
Also – use of obscure awards. Among 50 great writers we should be reading? Okaaay….
And yet what bothers me most is “tails.”
Writers are legally bound to work the word “tails” into any title when horses are featured in the book. Look it up. It’s in the Constitution.
‘Loving’ the accusatory tone of the “2015 Winner of 50 Great Writers You Should Be Reading” Award. I genuinely feel like a philistine now. 🙂
I would nominate this for a “credit where credit is due” tag if I could read the credits.
Whoa, the woman sure has a REALLY creepy face.
What kind of drugs is she on?
I’ll bet that bronies are involved here. “Tail” is almost as dumb as “clop”. Don’t know why “briar” had to be done over.
A book about zombies and horses?