7 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
WarGoat
8 years ago

The concept is interesting. The font makes me wonder where the giant singing lips are.

Hitch
8 years ago

Like the art. Am ambivalent about the font. And the font color.

I mean…no pun intended–it’s gilding the lily, ain’t it? We are already “getting” the horror, from Frank’s face in the (evil little) butterfly wings, right? (You want horror? Study butterflies, trust me. Original vampires.)

Hmmmmmm….thinking about what font I would have gone with, here. It’s worth thinking about, because I do like the art.

(Nathan, oh fearless leader–why IS this here?)

Lydia
Lydia
8 years ago
Reply to  Hitch

Because the author’s name isn’t mentioned at all but the artist’s is? Agree about the art though. Have no clue about the font except it needs to change.

Naaman Brown
Naaman Brown
8 years ago
Reply to  Lydia

I peeked. “Horror in Bloom” with sole credit “Art by…” gave me the impression it might be a book of art. It’s an anthology, stories by divers hands.

Tuula
Tuula
8 years ago
Reply to  Hitch

It so does belong here.

1. using a strongly recognisable custom font from a copyrighted property – nope; unless your book is about the making of Rocky Horror, or Tim Curry’s make up tips or some such.

2. Aspect ratio. Let’s take a pretty OK bit of artwork and squash it, because how else would you know this is the book I makes myself?

3. Written by ?

Eli
Eli
8 years ago

Interesting mismatch between the title and the image: even though it’s called “Horror in Bloom” the flowers are pushed off to the side to make room for the skull-butterflies and eggs.

john e. . .
8 years ago

And correct me if I’m wrong – but don’t butterflies hatch from cocoons (or chrysalisesI would have bet money that would be chrysalae)?

Not eggs.

Not even scary eggs.