“Girl That …” rather than “Girl Who …” objectifies the girl; I would not be surprised (considering the genre) if the word choice was deliberate.
James F. Brown
9 years ago
Oh, and no author listed on the cover. Understandable.
RK
9 years ago
About The Author:
I am a writer that loves to push the limits of what is acceptable. Doing this has resulted in 20 of my books being banned during the rush to sensorship in 2010 and continues to cripple my ability to write the type of pervers fiction my fans enjoy reading. I think publishers should alow any type of fiction on any subject to be publish. Because the definition of fiction is a story that isn’t real but imaginary.
As one can see, the quality of the writer matches that of the cover.
I am so used to badly cropped add-ons with no sense of perspective at LBC, I thought the cover paster meant to put both hands on one side of the horse. It would look better if her right hand was on the other side of the horse’s shoulder but whoever produced and signed off this just didn’t care.
That is what we call a silo and around here our silos don’t have windows or armpit hair.
Naaman Brown
9 years ago
Gentle suggestion for improvement: if you are going to sell a book, the cover must be attractive, and that should be especially true of erotica. The squished abstract ratio makes the main subject unattractive here. And the badly cropped and pasted-on girl does not improve the cover either. (Sometimes adding an attractive girl helps by distraction, but the key is attractive.)
Don Reed
9 years ago
I’ll take 100,000 copies of the limited edition signed by the Queen of England (a racing fan), please. Please mail them to My Son Chuck, Windsor Castle, Bidenmytime, PA.
What is stuck on her tits?
– No suggestions pleeeaaaseee! Very rhetorical Q.
Let’s just say “MS Paint Reborn” and be done with it.
There were no black modesty boxes, so they used blackened marshmallows. Or the spray can tool.
Black Cheez-It (from a spray can). Rustoleum also works, in a pinch.
I guess it is pretty hard to find a stock photo of a woman riding a horse… oh, nope.
That is… that is a very large horse. Either that or she’s a hobbit.
“That is… that is a very large horse.”
That’s why she loves him so!
A grammatically incorrect title to go with a proportionally incorrect girl.
“Girl That …” rather than “Girl Who …” objectifies the girl; I would not be surprised (considering the genre) if the word choice was deliberate.
Oh, and no author listed on the cover. Understandable.
About The Author:
As one can see, the quality of the writer matches that of the cover.
“…my ability to write the type of pervers fiction my fans enjoy reading.”
This author has fans? Okaaaaay. Whatever…
Is that a window in the tower or a curiously large amount of armpit hair?
That’s her head hair, cascading down her back.
However, did anyone else notice that the horse’s withers are transparent, and her hand can be seen through them?
I am so used to badly cropped add-ons with no sense of perspective at LBC, I thought the cover paster meant to put both hands on one side of the horse. It would look better if her right hand was on the other side of the horse’s shoulder but whoever produced and signed off this just didn’t care.
That is what we call a silo and around here our silos don’t have windows or armpit hair.
Gentle suggestion for improvement: if you are going to sell a book, the cover must be attractive, and that should be especially true of erotica. The squished abstract ratio makes the main subject unattractive here. And the badly cropped and pasted-on girl does not improve the cover either. (Sometimes adding an attractive girl helps by distraction, but the key is attractive.)
I’ll take 100,000 copies of the limited edition signed by the Queen of England (a racing fan), please. Please mail them to My Son Chuck, Windsor Castle, Bidenmytime, PA.