Maybe I’m getting cynical from visiting LBC too often, but that title and artwork seem to be implying Mummy Porn. If so, that is just sick. (I’m not going to click through to verify if its true; I’m just saying that is what the cover seems to be implying)
I’ve seen those shows where they unwrap mummy bindings, revealing a shriveled corpse… My stomach is churning.
Take Cover
9 years ago
I thought this one was working pretty well — until I scrolled down and saw the unfortunate lettering.
As for aspect ratio though, the artwork is so stylized I’m not sure how you could tell. And/or maybe the mummified thing really was short and stout. Chubby mummy porn 🙂
I am going to admit it–I’m not sure I hate it, outright. There’s something sort of…suited, with the unreadable font. I wouldn’t leave it that way, of course, but I can see how they TRIED it.
Chubby Mummy Porn? As someone else around here says, Sweet Baby Jesus!
Naaman Brown
9 years ago
All you dirty minded people suggesting “(heart) Luscious Melchus” is mummy porn. Mummy porn is not written by guys named Alexei (It’s written by guys named Oedipus).
Maybe this is just nice clean BDSM using mummy wrapping instead of hobble dress or bondage sleep sack, and Melchus is not someone’s mummy.
(OK I too am too creepified to dare look at the link to see.)
Oh no, The Erect Oak is back in popular posts! It is an evil omen!
Will, there are some secrets best not unleased on an innocent world (where is that Lovecraft quote when I need it? Ah, here: “… some day the piecing together of dissociated knowledge will open up such terrifying vistas of reality, and of our frightful position therein, that we shall either go mad from the revelation or flee from the deadly light into the peace and safety of a new dark age.”)
![cover[1]](https://lousybookcovers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/cover146.jpg)
Maybe I’m getting cynical from visiting LBC too often, but that title and artwork seem to be implying Mummy Porn. If so, that is just sick. (I’m not going to click through to verify if its true; I’m just saying that is what the cover seems to be implying)
I’ve seen those shows where they unwrap mummy bindings, revealing a shriveled corpse… My stomach is churning.
I thought this one was working pretty well — until I scrolled down and saw the unfortunate lettering.
As for aspect ratio though, the artwork is so stylized I’m not sure how you could tell. And/or maybe the mummified thing really was short and stout. Chubby mummy porn 🙂
I am going to admit it–I’m not sure I hate it, outright. There’s something sort of…suited, with the unreadable font. I wouldn’t leave it that way, of course, but I can see how they TRIED it.
Chubby Mummy Porn? As someone else around here says, Sweet Baby Jesus!
All you dirty minded people suggesting “(heart) Luscious Melchus” is mummy porn. Mummy porn is not written by guys named Alexei (It’s written by guys named Oedipus).
Maybe this is just nice clean BDSM using mummy wrapping instead of hobble dress or bondage sleep sack, and Melchus is not someone’s mummy.
(OK I too am too creepified to dare look at the link to see.)
I admit it. I clicked. Dear God.
Well? Is it mummy porn or not?
Yeah, no kidding, Enquiring Minds wanna know! Is it, or ain’t it?
Oh no, The Erect Oak is back in popular posts! It is an evil omen!
Will, there are some secrets best not unleased on an innocent world (where is that Lovecraft quote when I need it? Ah, here: “… some day the piecing together of dissociated knowledge will open up such terrifying vistas of reality, and of our frightful position therein, that we shall either go mad from the revelation or flee from the deadly light into the peace and safety of a new dark age.”)