Nathan, I think there’s a mistake on this page. There’s a random picture of a vacant lot that in no way resembles a book cover.
Wait, what do you mean that “random picture of a vacant lot” is the book cover?
As a side note, this one could also have gotten on here for a lousy blurb. I suppose it’s not surprising that the author, having never seen a book cover before, has also never read the back of a book before. However, despite her complete lack of familiarity with the world of literature, she’s also got a very high opinion of her importance in it.
Nathan, I think there’s a mistake on this page. There’s a random picture of a vacant lot that in no way resembles a book cover.
Wait, what do you mean that “random picture of a vacant lot” is the book cover?
As a side note, this one could also have gotten on here for a lousy blurb. I suppose it’s not surprising that the author, having never seen a book cover before, has also never read the back of a book before. However, despite her complete lack of familiarity with the world of literature, she’s also got a very high opinion of her importance in it.
Some bloke writes about what he thinks lesbians do. And throws his gabage on Amazon. What could possibly go wrong?
From the description:
“It is a manifesto wrapped in the covers of a novel.”
Thanks for the clear red flag.