So it does. I’m trying and failing to figure out what’s going on with that. My first guess would be cut & paste failure, but if so, it’s a very odd one: we carefully cut everything around the fence, but for some reason left the fence on the horse’s leg?
And trust me, real horsefolks would NOT stand there, smooching or whatever, with two horses fighting. Just wouldn’t happen, it’s too dangerous, especially if they’re stallions. It’s just…absurd. Too much at risk.
The thing is, someone worked hard on this. The coloration, the placement, the frame/border, the horse’s leg through the loop on the swashed D…(I can’t decide if that’s a terminal or an ear, for that letter; neither really seems to fit…).
It’s a shame that it just misses. Or…it misses. I’m not sure that “just” is the word.
(Nathan, dear, is the inbox bin on CC.com empty? Is that what’s going on????)
So the horses are in front of the text, but the text is in front of the people, and the people are in front of the horses. This is one weird mixed-up reality.
But then the horse on the w couldn’t jump through the D!
The horse on the left appears to have a leg glued to a section of fence.
So it does. I’m trying and failing to figure out what’s going on with that. My first guess would be cut & paste failure, but if so, it’s a very odd one: we carefully cut everything around the fence, but for some reason left the fence on the horse’s leg?
And trust me, real horsefolks would NOT stand there, smooching or whatever, with two horses fighting. Just wouldn’t happen, it’s too dangerous, especially if they’re stallions. It’s just…absurd. Too much at risk.
The horses are like a miniature version of the main image, except that she has a font stuck on her forearm instead of a fence stuck on her foreleg.
The thing is, someone worked hard on this. The coloration, the placement, the frame/border, the horse’s leg through the loop on the swashed D…(I can’t decide if that’s a terminal or an ear, for that letter; neither really seems to fit…).
It’s a shame that it just misses. Or…it misses. I’m not sure that “just” is the word.
(Nathan, dear, is the inbox bin on CC.com empty? Is that what’s going on????)
I think it’s fairly decent, but I’ve been visiting LBC too long, so it seems like it ought to be a shape-shifter mail-order bride tentacle romance.
But yeah, maybe moving the title down so it echoes the shape of the skirt would help.
I have no idea what’s going on, though.
So the horses are in front of the text, but the text is in front of the people, and the people are in front of the horses. This is one weird mixed-up reality.