ADMIN: A new chapter in the Pantytwist Chronicles

Frank Arcilesi, author of the recently featured book Science Fiction Stories: 8 Supernatural Stories, messaged the LousyBookCovers page on Facebook to opine:

The Science Fiction Stories cover is a draft you imbeciles. It’s not up as a cover for that book. You should be sued for defamation.

You think you are critics, but you are imbeciles.

(Yes, he sent those as two separate messages, five minutes apart. Usually, that indicates a “What I SHOULD have said” moment, but I don’t see that the second message was a particular improvement in wit and snark.)

My response was:

Aw, did we hurt your feelings? It was on a book being offered for sale; that ain’t a “draft.” But hey, you spelled “imbeciles” right both times — good work!

I am proud of my forbearance, in that I did not tear apart his ludicrous misunderstanding of what “defamation” is.


EDIT: It gets better! He responded with a much longer paragraph:

That’s a childish response that was expected from the creators of such a site. Actually, it is a draft. It’s not up on any site for that book. That’s a fact. You should be more careful about what you are critical about lest someone sue you. People who operate professional sites should operate in a professional manner. I respect people who try to create something. People who try to create something whether it is a vaccine to cure a disease or something else to help mankind are those to be respected and they help move our society forward. Those who sit back, cannot create anything, and can only be critical to in order to feel important, are not respected and contribute nothing to society. I hate to hurt your feelings but you website is not considered professional or respected. It has no value.

I think we’re gonna have to fisk this completely:

That’s a childish response that was expected from the creators of such a site.

This, coming from a guy who thinks that calling people “imbeciles” up front is mature.

Actually, it is a draft. It’s not up on any site for that book. That’s a fact.

Sort of.  Frank has changed the cover since I posted this.  Here’s the current cover:

Yup, still lousy.

But the fact remains that the cover I posted initially WAS offered for sale on Smashwords — not a pre-order, not a “draft,” an actual for-sale book.  So unless we say that EVERYTHING is a “draft” because you could potentially change it sometime in the future, this contention is simply false.

You should be more careful about what you are critical about lest someone sue you.

Yeah, I’ve been operating this site for almost a decade, gotten national press, and nobody’s sued me yet. Maybe because they have more than a piss-poor understanding of what “defamation” means.

But secondly… is he really saying that being “critical” is legitimate grounds for a lawsuit? The fact that someone who styles himself as a professional author has so little understanding of or respect for the First Amendment is appalling.

I respect people who try to create something. People who try to create something whether it is a vaccine to cure a disease or something else to help mankind are those to be respected and they help move our society forward. Those who sit back, cannot create anything, and can only be critical to in order to feel important, are not respected and contribute nothing to society.

Should I refer him to my books, to my art, to my webcomic, to the things I accomplish in addition to make fun of putzes like him? Or would that irreparably damage his self-esteem that hinges him self-identifying as A Creator?  Ain’t looking for your respect, Frank.

I hate to hurt your feelings but

Trust me, Frank, having a thin-skinned know-nothing like you not like me isn’t even close to enough to hurt my feelings. I’m just laughing at you.

you website is not considered professional or respected. It has no value.

Ooh, that passive voice means it’s a fact, right?  Again, I’m not going to take seriously a lecture on professionalism from this guy:

Sorry to all you surfers and commenters who are wasting your time on a website with “no value,” though.  Don’t try to dispute it; Frank has spoken.

15 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ron Miller
Ron Miller
4 years ago

Well, Frank, I am a professional with probably more years’ experience as a designer than you have been alive…and I consider LBC to be both professional and useful. For which I respect it.

And your new cover is as godawful as the first one.

Ron Miller
Ron Miller
4 years ago

People who try to create something whether it is a vaccine to cure a disease or something else to help mankind are those to be respected and they help move our society forward. “

Is he talking about himself here? I just don’t see myself putting him in the same category as Jonas Salk.

Ron Miller
Ron Miller
4 years ago
Myk
Myk
4 years ago
Reply to  Ron Miller

There’s a book about a ghostly kite.

A GHOSTLY KITE.

El Cochinote
4 years ago
Reply to  Myk

As an author who wrote about a talking jar I don’t see anything wrong with that…

Davourak
4 years ago
Reply to  Ron Miller

Plenty of material for this site there

invader
invader
4 years ago

Science fiction or supernatural PICK ONE

Tristi Pinkston
4 years ago

He’s pulling in arguments that are completely nonrelated to the issue as he tries to strengthen his stance. Secondly, he doesn’t understand proper comma use. Third, if it’s not up for sale on any site, how did you find it to post it? Bit of a logical fallacy there.

The fact is, having his cover featured was offensive to his pride, and rather than conjuring up all these arguments, it would have been so much better had he shared his thoughts and feelings more honestly instead of hiding them behind all that smoke. I’m sure you have more open and frank conversations with people all the time, and those people go on to improve their craft.

Myk
Myk
4 years ago

This guy gets the Norman Boutin Medal of Misplaced Author Outrage.

Zsuzsa
Zsuzsa
4 years ago
Reply to  Myk

He hasn’t accused Nathan of giving his sister cancer, so I think he’s still a few notches below that particular example.

Francois Tremblay
Francois Tremblay
4 years ago

Criticism is much more useful to creativity than “respecting creators.” Of course we should respect people who actually create things, but the ability to look at things with a critical eye is what propels art forward.

Xodiac
Xodiac
4 years ago

Hey, awesome. It’s been a while since someone got upset enough at this site that they tried to call you out. Good to see you haven’t lost your touch!

Davourak
4 years ago

“you website” — was he calling you a website, or did he mean “your website”? Either way, poor writing skills on display here.