Well, at least as pseudohumans go, she’s pretty well rendered.
But yellow text (and Algerian font – geez how eighties) over fleshtones: no, that really doesn’t work.
What’s with the pixelated squarish thing in the lower left corner?
I’d say it’s a little piece of the original picture he overlooked while altering the background for this cover.
RK@HM
5 years ago
You could also add cut and paste to the tags, although in this case it’s all cut and no paste. Unless the artist (some pervert calling himself strutter79) gave the designer permission to use the original image this way, I’m also thinking this is a case of image search gone wrong.
As mentioned concerning previouscovers for whole graphic novels consisting of pseudo-human renderings, this is where pseudo-humanity got its start: pornography. For all the artist’s depravity, this is actually one of the tamer rendered images one can find online; I mean, at least the girl’s (apparently) of majority age, her naughty bits are (however minimally) covered, and she isn’t actually being penetrated in any of her orifices at the moment. One can’t say the same of very many other such rendered characters.
Well found RK, re the original pic. And now that we’ve seen that, it’s more noticeable the remaining bits of otherwise-painted-out figure visible through the back bars of that cage thing.
That’s courtesy of TinEye, at which I also found the one of the original pictures used for making… this cover.
axolotl
5 years ago
The artwork is serviceable, if not great. It’s certainly obvious it’s BDSM. What ruins it is the awful font over the parts of the illustration the audience probably most want to see. It could all have been put in that huge blank space at the bottom.
J…James Bondage?!
Well, I’m down for another Crusade.
I guess he takes his lassies Shaven, not Stirred.
Actually, he likes them glabrous; that hair on her head is a wig.
Oooooh, glabrous. You silver-tongued devil, you.
Well, at least as pseudohumans go, she’s pretty well rendered.
But yellow text (and Algerian font – geez how eighties) over fleshtones: no, that really doesn’t work.
What’s with the pixelated squarish thing in the lower left corner?
I’d say it’s a little piece of the original picture he overlooked while altering the background for this cover.
You could also add cut and paste to the tags, although in this case it’s all cut and no paste. Unless the artist (some pervert calling himself strutter79) gave the designer permission to use the original image this way, I’m also thinking this is a case of image search gone wrong.
As mentioned concerning previous covers for whole graphic novels consisting of pseudo-human renderings, this is where pseudo-humanity got its start: pornography. For all the artist’s depravity, this is actually one of the tamer rendered images one can find online; I mean, at least the girl’s (apparently) of majority age, her naughty bits are (however minimally) covered, and she isn’t actually being penetrated in any of her orifices at the moment. One can’t say the same of very many other such rendered characters.
IDK, about her age. Those arms look like tween arms, to me.
Normally I’d agree, but when those arms are on a gal as tall and… curvy as this one, they’re more accurately known as “starvation victim” arms.
Yeah, but if that’s not Willa Holland, I’ll eat my sexy bunny slippers.
Well found RK, re the original pic. And now that we’ve seen that, it’s more noticeable the remaining bits of otherwise-painted-out figure visible through the back bars of that cage thing.
That’s courtesy of TinEye, at which I also found the one of the original pictures used for making… this cover.
The artwork is serviceable, if not great. It’s certainly obvious it’s BDSM. What ruins it is the awful font over the parts of the illustration the audience probably most want to see. It could all have been put in that huge blank space at the bottom.
Of Pseudohuman Bondage