11 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
RK
RK
7 years ago

“No, no! Point the camera over this way… and focus on me, not the obviously cut-and-paste stuffed toy someone shopped into this scene!”

Hitch
7 years ago
Reply to  RK

RK! Lovely to see ya, but…them’s sandy toes, bro. 😉 Not a stuffed toy, but the comparison is hilarious.

RK
RK
7 years ago
Reply to  Hitch

That did look a bit like a furry foot, but it also looked a lot like teddy bear shag.

Either way, it’s still cut-and-paste; aren’t the big toes supposed to be on the in-side of your feet?

Grackle
Grackle
7 years ago

For some reason this cover kind of grosses me out. I don’t have an issue with feet or anything–there’s just something really disconcerting about this tiny portion of foot right up close like that.

Naaman Brown
Naaman Brown
7 years ago

Sandy toes for sure.
Everything else is fuzzy.

Ericb
Ericb
7 years ago

Well, at least they got their money’s worth.

John Yeo Jr
7 years ago
Reply to  Ericb

Yup. Good covers cost more than a penny, maybe.

David King
7 years ago

The photographer’s fee somehow ended up on the cover in place of the title.

Naaman Brown
Naaman Brown
7 years ago

Ctrl- zoom in to thumbnail ad size, her sandy toe looks like a face, her sunlit leg looks like a shoulder, and her shadowed shoulder looks like hair. Ctrl+ zoom out the illusion disappears. Awesome.

Lydia D
Lydia D
7 years ago

What is that, a deformed chicken nugget? A scruffy teddy bear? If someone hadn’t /said/ it was feet, I never would’ve known–but on the other hand, knowing that it’s someone’s dirty foot doesn’t actually make me want to buy the book more.

L-Plate Pen
L-Plate Pen
7 years ago

This is how my mum took photos on her old Kodak camera until she worked out which little glass window was the one she needed to look through.