7 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
EricL
EricL
8 years ago

Uncle Phil is looking stylish wearing Aunt Mabel’s sunglasses.

Naaman Brown
Naaman Brown
8 years ago

From eBook. independent small press, self-pub, whatever ends up here on LBC, doesn’t anyone look at the covers before hitting “publish”?

When I was in book making manufacture 1969-2004 we had a gauntlet of proofreaders at the press, at the publisher, who all had to sign off before anything went to plate making then to the presses. What happened to quality control?
Because the author, typesetter and publisher today are often the same one person, there would be less excuse, I would hope, for blatant errors to hit the market, if the producer cared.

But I must admit I have seen some pretty amusing stuff here. Lousy book covers make for cheap entertainment, but sometimes I am saddened or angered or both.

Take Cover
Take Cover
8 years ago

Even if his name really is Phillp, that’s still a lousy cover. And the misuse of those hyphens suggests this would be a painful reading experience. I’m not mad at you, Mr Cruit, just disappointed.

Naaman Brown
Naaman Brown
8 years ago
Reply to  Take Cover

“Phillip Moonfire Shot-to-pieces” is the title everywhere — the Amazon book page, the title page of the Look Inside! preview; Phillip Chester Carlson (aka Phillip Moonfire) is the protagonist’s name in the text of the preview. Except on the cover where it’s “Phillp….” Pffft.

Grackle
Grackle
8 years ago

Let’s see, what kind of cover will make potential readers want to pick up my book? Ah, here’s a picture of some schlub in hanging out in a hotel lobby with a bunch of plastic flowers, perfect.

James F. Brown
James F. Brown
8 years ago

Spelling? Schmelling!

Who cares? You can tell he’s one cool dude by the shades he wears!

Cool dudes don’t need no stinkin’ spell checkers.

L-Plate Pen
L-Plate Pen
8 years ago

‘Phillp’ looks pretty chilled for a guy who’s shot to pieces.