Terror on Jupiter

jupiter

Terror on Jupiter

It’s a graphic novel. That means the whole thing looks like this.

Spread the love
9 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Cathy Adams
Cathy Adams
8 years ago

I like this one. Someone who understands graphics will have to explain why this is here.

red
red
8 years ago

When do we get to the ones by Harry Potter Lovecraft?

Catie
Catie
8 years ago

The art is good, especially for a comic. It’s what’s done with it that’s criminal. Cutting it out to look like a paper cutout makes it look crappy and cheap, putting it on a photo background makes it look even cheaper, and surrounding it with badly done metallic effects and fonts makes it look goddamn awful. If they had splashed a bit of color on the drawing (not colored pencils but perhaps Copics or some other markers/pens), put an appropriate drawn background, dropped the metallic crap and put a decent font on it – you know, make it look like a cover of a comic – it would have been a perfectly good cover.

Cathy Adams
Cathy Adams
8 years ago
Reply to  Catie

I can see that now: It’s a mixture of comic art hand drawn by an artist over a generated backgroundj and surrounded by what is sort of a picture of a metallic “frame”. Just so that I understand, mixing drawn comic art and a photographed or computer generated background is a graphic no-no? If so, is it considered lazy graphics?

Catie
Catie
8 years ago
Reply to  Cathy Adams

It can work, but in 99% of times it doesn’t. It usually takes a genius to make it look good. And it particularly doesn’t work if you cut it out like the laser shot bit is cut here. Maaaaybe it would’ve looked better if it were drawn directly on the photo (not with black ink, of course) but I wouldn’t bet on it. Lazy graphics, yes.

Yeah, when I zoomed in, I saw the art wasn’t the best. It’s a bit messy. But people are not going to look at it zoomed in, and it looks decent at normal viewing size. Not Marvel quality by far, but decent. A bit of color slapped on it might cover the messy bits and make it pop (of course, bad coloring could easily make it worse, so all of this is just my wishful thinking).

Ron Miller
8 years ago

And it’s not “from” Howard Phillips Lovecraft. He had nothing to do with it. It may be “based on” or “inspired by,” but that’s the best the author can say.

john e. . .
8 years ago

Somebody – please – shoot the guy responsible for the logo at the bottom.

Catie
Catie
8 years ago
Reply to  john e. . .

Oh, look, it’s shitting rainbows! It must run on unicorn farts.