If they’d only used the top font I would’ve mistaken it for a terrible Misfits tribute album.
Naaman Brown
8 years ago
The cover is much better without the middle black bar and red font repeat of the title. (I did a cut’n’paste of the jpg.) Why repeat the title? Why blot the only good part of the cover? Do small presses see appearance on LBC as good publicity?
Altho’ the art has potential, the modern grooved plexiglass window does not match the decayed cobwebby frame; kinda reminds me of the DVD cover for “Human Centipede”.
![cover[1]](https://lousybookcovers.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/cover1-27.jpg)
That photo had potential.
Yeah…you know, it damn well did. That’s a shame.
If they’d only used the top font I would’ve mistaken it for a terrible Misfits tribute album.
The cover is much better without the middle black bar and red font repeat of the title. (I did a cut’n’paste of the jpg.) Why repeat the title? Why blot the only good part of the cover? Do small presses see appearance on LBC as good publicity?
Altho’ the art has potential, the modern grooved plexiglass window does not match the decayed cobwebby frame; kinda reminds me of the DVD cover for “Human Centipede”.