![cover[1]](https://lousybookcovers.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/cover15.jpg)
According to Goodreads, “this novel contains disturbingly explicit sexual and deviant content that may be considered offensive to some readers, including rape, torture and cannibalism.” And here I just thought it was about a photobombing puppy!
According to Goodreads, “this novel contains disturbingly explicit sexual and deviant content that may be considered offensive to some readers, including rape, torture and cannibalism.” And here I just thought it was about a photobombing puppy!
Before I read the comment I thought this was a novel about a lost puppy named Hillary.
Another obvious author pseudonym.
This book should also be prosecuted for false advertising. Sure hope no parent buys this thinking it’s a children’s book.
That’s assuming anyone manages to find it in the barely readable title.
Yeah, no. There is no false advertising here. OK, maybe the cover is a bit misleading (but really, there is “dark novel” — whatever that is — written in it, so only a moron would think it’s a children’s book), but the Book Description tells you what the book is about. (Again, only a moron would buy a book without reading the description.)
I prefer Angel Gelique’s light novels. Her ‘Angel Gelique’ shower gel is highly recommended too. She has also brought out a range of eye liner which is applied by the thumb, you can see it in the book cover above. I recommend ‘Thumbgelique Eyeliner’ highly. So does Hillary.
LOL. “Tail of the Dog” starring Raccoon Girl.
First of all, Nathan, don’t you have anything better to do with your time than to bully authors who design their own covers, assuming that’s what the author did in the first place. I mean, really, are you in junior high school or just ridiculously immature?
Second of all, James F. Brown (who surely looks old enough to know better), get your facts straight about false advertising before making such an absurd claim. Prosecutors would have an easier time prosecuting you for stupidity. Do you really think a parent would confuse that book for a children’s book? I’d hate to see how your kids turned out. Let’s hope you don’t have any, because you definitely don’t have any common sense.
Absolutely right, SevenSapiens, only a moron would think it’s a children’s book.
LOL, “Moron Man” starring James F. Brown.
Ooh, let’s descend immediately to ad hominem insults to convey the moral high ground of our outrage!
And by the way, expert use of the current hot-button bad-guy word “bully.” I’m sorry you couldn’t work in “racist,” too.
I smell a flounce coming, do you?
Hey, look, if you can’t take criticism, NO MATTER HOW BAD it is, you should NOT write. If you can’t handle people saying bad things about your book (or it’s cover), and their right to do so, you are the one who’s ridiculously immature here.
Oh, I made a little mistake here. I meant to write “and _accept_ their right to do so”.
I made two mistakes, apparently. The other one was assuming the person who made this comment was the book’s author.
Well, one can understand why I assumed that.
Nope, Nathan, didn’t see anything racial in your criticsm and I used the word “bully” because it encompasses the very behavior you (and all the other self-proclaimed critics of book cover art) exhibit. Surely everyone is entitled to their opinion. But an entire website to mock book covers? Seems like a rather ridiculous use of time, in MY opinion.
No, SevenSapiens, I am not the author but the book was recommended to me and I happened upon this site while I was researching it. I saw many of the other insulting posts for numerous many books. None of them deserve such bashing. I just chose to comment here because I was appalled that someone would actually worry about people mistaking this particular book for a kid’s book.
But anyway, carry on with your stone throwing and book cover witch hunt! I won’t be back to stoop to your level again.
I feel so shamed by my betters!
“None of them deserve such bashing”
It does not matter if it deserves or not to be bashed. Criticizing the design of a cover or a work of fiction or anything is NOT a personal attack. People have right to bash whatever they want, and I find it outrageous that anyone would be against their right to do that.
Do you think saying a movie sucks is bullying it’s director and/or the actors who worked on it? When you think a movie is bad, don’t you say anything about it?
If I want to say The Shawshank Redemption is the worst movie ever made, and that Morgan Freeman acted terribly in it, I have the right to do so – even if the movie (or Morgan Freeman) “doesn’t deserve it” –, and I can’t believe any reasonable person could be against my right to do that. I don’t understand how anyone can be against freedom of speech.
You might not reply to my comment, but I believe you will read anyway, so: You’re the one in the lower level here.