Blood in the Fire April 13, 2016 Blood in the Fire Now imagine it as directed by J.J. Abrams. Spread the love Tags: busybusybusy, cut and paste, pseudohumans ◀ Mail Order Bride: A Christmas Miracle – The Hunted Bride Do Dreams Come True? ▶ 7 Comments Oldest Newest Most Voted Inline Feedbacks View all comments Lydia 8 years ago I first read the title as “BLOOD in the FRIDGE”. john e. . . 8 years ago Reply to Lydia Are you ‘hangry?’ It’s a word, I hear. Some kind of portmanteau. Of course, people who use ‘hangry’ wouldn’t know a portmanteau from a port-a-potty. RK 8 years ago I’m not imagining much difference between this and the J.J. Abrams version, other than it being live-action and having a lot more lens flares! Bruce 8 years ago Reply to RK You beat me to needing more lens flares! 😉 James F. Brown 8 years ago Reply to RK Lens flares are totally cool. And oh so artistic-like. Ericb 8 years ago Reply to James F. Brown Guess What? I got a fever! And the only prescription … is more lens flares! Naaman Brown 8 years ago Reply to James F. Brown I like the retro panache of accidental lens flare. It’s the post-production CGI added lens flare that strikes me as too poseur.
![cover[1]](https://lousybookcovers.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/cover1-12.jpg)
I first read the title as “BLOOD in the FRIDGE”.
Are you ‘hangry?’
It’s a word, I hear.
Some kind of portmanteau. Of course, people who use ‘hangry’ wouldn’t know a portmanteau from a port-a-potty.
I’m not imagining much difference between this and the J.J. Abrams version, other than it being live-action and having a lot more lens flares!
You beat me to needing more lens flares! 😉
Lens flares are totally cool. And oh so artistic-like.
Guess What? I got a fever! And the only prescription … is more lens flares!
I like the retro panache of accidental lens flare. It’s the post-production CGI added lens flare that strikes me as too poseur.