12 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
katz
katz
8 years ago

Oh man, it’s so close to being good art.

Waffles
Waffles
8 years ago
Reply to  katz

Yes! I agree.

PosRe: If the typography was stronger this would be a good cover.

Take Cover
Take Cover
8 years ago
Reply to  Waffles

Yes, if the typography was stronger *and* the art was actually good as opposed to just being close to good. I do very much like that lustrous ‘porcelain’ look though. (Can anyone tell me how to create that effect? I’m talking about the sort of layered glow that seems to come from the title and from the woman’s skin and clothes.)

Catie
Catie
8 years ago
Reply to  Take Cover

I don’t know about that particular glow, but I like this soft glow effect: http://zeldacw.deviantart.com/art/tutorial-soft-glow-effect-29134298

Take Cover
Take Cover
8 years ago
Reply to  Catie

Thanks! It’s kinda hard to tell from the example if that would produce the elusive ‘porcelain’ look, but it looks like it might — and it would for sure be a good place to start playing around. Thanks for the link!

Catie
Catie
8 years ago
Reply to  Take Cover

Yeah, the art isn’t exactly great. The result is a sort of dreamy, soft feel to the image. I’ve used it a couple of times and it really makes the drawing pop, especially if the original colors are a bit washed out.

Catie
Catie
8 years ago

Oragon Shaman? Eragon? Oregon?

Drawing tip #1: smudge tool is not as awesome as you think it is.

Naaman Brown
Naaman Brown
8 years ago
Reply to  Catie

Yep. Oregon. I recognize Mt. Hood.

Seriously tho’ that font. That’s a D???

catie
catie
8 years ago
Reply to  Naaman Brown

I think it’s based on an actual Gaelic/Celtic font that was used in 16 century and later. That D was an actual letter at one time. But letters evolve just like the language, and this D is not the D we use today. That’s why all the Celtics, Uncials, Gothics and whatever they’re called are not good fonts for book covers. Their letters are obsolete.

catie
catie
8 years ago
Reply to  Naaman Brown

Personally, I LOVE Uncials. But they’re not for book covers. Even that T is barely a T.

DED
DED
8 years ago

Considering past “artwork” that has appeared on this site, I’d give this one a pass, even though the typeface is lacking.

catie
catie
8 years ago
Reply to  DED

I wouldn’t. It’s awkward and stiff. It is better than the average refrigerator art, true, but that’s not exactly hard to achieve. I mean, there are elephants out there that draw better than the average refrigerator artist. I’m not even kidding. http://www.elephantart.com/catalog/product_info.php/products_id/1727 A freaking elephant drew this. I’d put this on an elephant related book any day. The drawing might be simplistic, but it’s not awkward.