8 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
john e. . .
9 years ago

Nathan: “Where’s his other foot?”

Me: He shot it off with that ridiculously small “rifle.”

Personally, I never know what I’m supposed to make of this kind of “stencil person” on top of realistic images. In comics it would be a way to show these giants are ghosts or invisible.

Is this a way to show mystical power in lousy book covers? Or just a bit of short hand for authors to convey an intense hatred for their readers? I’d prefer that over thinking these people are really just that lazy.

Bruce
Bruce
9 years ago

I was wondering why he has a tail.

Naaman Brown
Naaman Brown
9 years ago

Nathan: “Where’s his other foot?”

Me: Beside the one that’s showing: he’s leaning on the girl. When she steps away, he’ll fall back on his hinnie. Retribution. “I am not your leaning post.”

misterfweem
misterfweem
9 years ago

Given some of the dusters I’ve seen, he doesn’t need that second leg. That leather is stiff enough to hold him up.

Naaman Brown
Naaman Brown
9 years ago
Reply to  misterfweem

Doesn’t neatsfoot oil come in spray cans?

James F. Brown
James F. Brown
9 years ago

I think transparent people on the cover is absolutely the way to go. Kinda makes up for the near-invisible author’s name and other stupid cover decisions.

L-Plate Pen
L-Plate Pen
9 years ago

I was wondering why they’re leaning on each other’s asses. Is it one of those trust exercises like they do in drama classes?

Synthetic Paper
Synthetic Paper
9 years ago

If this didn’t have the cartoony people, I would think of it as some kind of really creepy looking book from the late ’70s or early ’80s that would have anticipated being all disturbing, but once I finished it, I would find it boring.