I have a terrible feeling that this is what madness looks like.
I also sincerely hope that rotating the interior of a book through 90 degrees so that the words run vertically, from bottom to top, isn’t something that ever catches on.
Bruce
9 years ago
Her ribcage is inhumanly elongated, and, well, the girls are sagging something fierce. A new low for pseudo-humans?
RK
9 years ago
Well, I’ll say this for the people who do pseudo-humans: at least they give us lots of pictures of scantily clad women to view. Scantily clad women with plastic-looking two-dimensional skin and something disturbing in the way they hold their eyes more often than not, yes, but scantily clad women.
There are people out there who apparently disagree with your conclusion about the lousiness of this cover: one Amazon Reader actually found the scantily clad, plastic-looking, two-dimensional monster on the cover to be quite . . . beautiful.
This is a world of over 7 billion people. There’s bound to be at least one person who appreciates another person’s “artistic” output.
Sipesh
9 years ago
Hey, bookshelf-bewbs, let me set my beer down while I get this bag over THAT FACE… *shudders* It’s like she’s reaching out to grab your soul.
L.
9 years ago
Boobs don’t work that way.
ItsyBitsy
9 years ago
Oh no no no no no no NO.
I’m horrified on behalf of people whose 3D item designs have been sloppily slapped into this. Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooo. Oh gawd no.
Joe
9 years ago
The small text is unreadable even at full size. And it’s not a great idea to put the name of what I assume is a character right where the author’s name usually goes.
Invader
9 years ago
Must grab shiny red title, is what this one says to me with the figures arm is outstretched.
L-Plate Pen
9 years ago
Why bother wearing clothes that defy gravity when your boobs clearly don’t?
![cover[1]](https://lousybookcovers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/cover118-500x761.jpg)
Oh, dear Lord. I HAD to “look inside” – and it’s an indecipherable mess. Worse than this cover, if you can imagine such a thing.
That is a ‘Look Inside’ that shouldn’t haven been approved. I hope that actual book isn’t like that.
I have a terrible feeling that this is what madness looks like.
I also sincerely hope that rotating the interior of a book through 90 degrees so that the words run vertically, from bottom to top, isn’t something that ever catches on.
Her ribcage is inhumanly elongated, and, well, the girls are sagging something fierce. A new low for pseudo-humans?
Well, I’ll say this for the people who do pseudo-humans: at least they give us lots of pictures of scantily clad women to view. Scantily clad women with plastic-looking two-dimensional skin and something disturbing in the way they hold their eyes more often than not, yes, but scantily clad women.
Nathan, your comment made little sense, so I was forced to look inside.
Oh, how I rue that decision. It will haunt me to my dying days.
Alas, may that day be soon.
You should know by now not to trust me.
Also, Nathan (and everyone else here),
There are people out there who apparently disagree with your conclusion about the lousiness of this cover: one Amazon Reader actually found the scantily clad, plastic-looking, two-dimensional monster on the cover to be quite . . . beautiful.
His words, not mine.
This is a world of over 7 billion people. There’s bound to be at least one person who appreciates another person’s “artistic” output.
Hey, bookshelf-bewbs, let me set my beer down while I get this bag over THAT FACE… *shudders* It’s like she’s reaching out to grab your soul.
Boobs don’t work that way.
Oh no no no no no no NO.
I’m horrified on behalf of people whose 3D item designs have been sloppily slapped into this. Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooo. Oh gawd no.
The small text is unreadable even at full size. And it’s not a great idea to put the name of what I assume is a character right where the author’s name usually goes.
Must grab shiny red title, is what this one says to me with the figures arm is outstretched.
Why bother wearing clothes that defy gravity when your boobs clearly don’t?