7 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Syd
Syd
2 years ago

The “of” was handled so badly, from the mismatched o to the word being the largest on the cover. There’s an o in scorn that could have been used for the keyplate (which should have been reshaped to fit the font, imo).

Scorn is a (not well known?) collective noun for camels, but a better collective noun beginning with s (assuming alliteration was the goal) must surely exist. Words are a writer’s primary tools…

Hitch
2 years ago
Reply to  Syd

Most “special” words used for packs/collections/tribes/families of animals, are poorly known. It’s a specialized thing. Everybody knows “Murder of Crows” now, solely because of the novel/movie.

A Flamboyance of Flamingos, for example. A crash of Rhinos (!). A thunder of Hippos. A cauldron of bats! A convocation of Eagles. (A charm of Finches!)

I don’t expect even the best writers to know all those terms. To be fair. I’m more obsessive about homonyms and the like.

Syd
Syd
2 years ago
Reply to  Hitch

the sequel is apparently called Thorn of Secrets so now I’m sure my first guess was wrong, and I have no idea what the author is trying to do. Always a good sign /s

Hitch
2 years ago
Reply to  Syd

Well, the gist of the story–that’s a thorny question.

Francois Tremblay
Francois Tremblay
2 years ago

It’ll take a lot more than a bullet to the brain, lungs, heart, back and balls to kill Michael Scarn of Secrets.

Hitch
2 years ago

Or his biographer, B Truly.

LBC Participant
LBC Participant
2 years ago

But what if I like orange juice and don’t care what secrets it might be hiding?