<ol>
<li>Prison Planet–from mediocre to less-horribly mediocre.</li>
<li>Molly’s Misadventures–do you know, when I first saw that cover, on LBC, I thought the fleshy bits were two old knees, from some old person? Not hardly, you’d think, the sort of misadventure you’d advertise. Gotta give her some points for upscaling it somewhat. Still not a fantastic cover, but arithmetically better than the old Knee one!</li>
<li>Taken by the Wild Hunt: Y’know, I really liked the original base layer artwork and hated everything else. Now, I just hate all of it.</li>
<li>Open Season: Sigh. </li>
<li>A Destiny to Die For: Angelina probably sued but either cover is simply bad. Bad, bad and oh, yes, bad. </li>
<li>Phantom Quartz: well, the dog got top billing here….</li>
<li>Bible Dramatizations: It’s hard to know what to say here. Technically, it’s vastly improved, but…whut? </li>
<li>Timothy Mean–decidedly better. Still not clear, but…props for VASTLY better. </li>
<li>Dr. Eddy: Oh, come ON! Really? Author, get with it!</li>
<li>One Day at at Time [sic]: honestly, better before and that’s not even including the typo (“at at” instead of “at a”) on the cover. And, for crying out loud, a phrase that’s overused much AND was the name of a hit show for dog’s years? Yeesh. </li>
</ol>
I don’t know if that will work, Nathan–probably not. I’m trying it to help you troubleshoot. (For those who don’t see the orig. post, I’m using unordered list HTML *in* the post to see if that somehow works, as the built-in Rich Text editor appears to be choking on lists, both numbered and bulleted. Gonna be pissed if I have to retype this sucker, though.)
I sometimes manually type lists. Particularly in email environments where rich code is disabled and text-only is required. But…
1) Old
2) Fashioned
3) Text
4) Lists
5) Are
5) Sometimes
6) Wonky
LOL, no, you don’t say? 🙂 I mean, c’mon, I’m seriously trying to help him troubleshoot. It’s more work for me to do what I did, than to either manually do it, a la your post, or use the ul/ol’s that are sitting here.
Just trying to help. Oh, well. It’s a weird one! (maybe he needs to clear the CSS, before lists?) It’s truly odd.
IKR? It’s frustrating as hell. I’m going to have to resort to Goat’s manual listing, but I prefer lists with neatly-aligned hanging indents, dammit. I’m funny that way.
Oh, dear. So many bad covers, so little time!
(I swear to god if this list stuff doesn’t work…)
<ol>
<li>Prison Planet–from mediocre to less-horribly mediocre.</li>
<li>Molly’s Misadventures–do you know, when I first saw that cover, on LBC, I thought the fleshy bits were two old knees, from some old person? Not hardly, you’d think, the sort of misadventure you’d advertise. Gotta give her some points for upscaling it somewhat. Still not a fantastic cover, but arithmetically better than the old Knee one!</li>
<li>Taken by the Wild Hunt: Y’know, I really liked the original base layer artwork and hated everything else. Now, I just hate all of it.</li>
<li>Open Season: Sigh. </li>
<li>A Destiny to Die For: Angelina probably sued but either cover is simply bad. Bad, bad and oh, yes, bad. </li>
<li>Phantom Quartz: well, the dog got top billing here….</li>
<li>Bible Dramatizations: It’s hard to know what to say here. Technically, it’s vastly improved, but…whut? </li>
<li>Timothy Mean–decidedly better. Still not clear, but…props for VASTLY better. </li>
<li>Dr. Eddy: Oh, come ON! Really? Author, get with it!</li>
<li>One Day at at Time [sic]: honestly, better before and that’s not even including the typo (“at at” instead of “at a”) on the cover. And, for crying out loud, a phrase that’s overused much AND was the name of a hit show for dog’s years? Yeesh. </li>
</ol>
I don’t know if that will work, Nathan–probably not. I’m trying it to help you troubleshoot. (For those who don’t see the orig. post, I’m using unordered list HTML *in* the post to see if that somehow works, as the built-in Rich Text editor appears to be choking on lists, both numbered and bulleted. Gonna be pissed if I have to retype this sucker, though.)
Wahl, that didn’t work. sigh.
I sometimes manually type lists. Particularly in email environments where rich code is disabled and text-only is required. But…
1) Old
2) Fashioned
3) Text
4) Lists
5) Are
5) Sometimes
6) Wonky
LOL, no, you don’t say? 🙂 I mean, c’mon, I’m seriously trying to help him troubleshoot. It’s more work for me to do what I did, than to either manually do it, a la your post, or use the ul/ol’s that are sitting here.
Just trying to help. Oh, well. It’s a weird one! (maybe he needs to clear the CSS, before lists?) It’s truly odd.
[ol]
[li]Bible Dramatizations[/li]
[li]Timothy Mean[/li]
[/ol]
Drat.
IKR? It’s frustrating as hell. I’m going to have to resort to Goat’s manual listing, but I prefer lists with neatly-aligned hanging indents, dammit. I’m funny that way.