There are two ways some of these covers improved:
- A for-real designer used the original as a sketch to work from.
- A for-real designer DIDN’T use the original as a sketch to work from.
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
There are two ways some of these covers improved:
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Woooow. I mean…Nathan, you are exceeding even our wildest expectations here. We have a slateful for the 2022 Lousies, right here in River City.
Whew, a lotta lotta contenders today, Nathan. (This time, brother, I used the ordered list–numbered, in other words, for those of you that no-speaka-de HTML–so, let’s see if THAT works.)
Nope. Neither of the li (list) functions work here, Nathan.
Well, I don’t know what’s changed since they DID work. Hmm…
Any plugins updated on this WP template, or CMS? Anything like that? As you see it, I know it’s not a rendering issue at my end.
No, it’s doing the same thing on my end. I’m crawling through the css for both theme and plugin…