Sylvie: Dr. Richards’ Littles® 26 (Dr. Richards’ Littles)
The entire series is “branded” with a stethescope right across whatever is in the image behind it.
Sylvie: Dr. Richards’ Littles® 26 (Dr. Richards’ Littles)
The entire series is “branded” with a stethescope right across whatever is in the image behind it.
I thought it was one of those fun straws!
LOL, yes, me too.
At least (according to the description) the creepiness is intentional.
I don’t see any creepiness beyond the layout awkwardness.
I didn’t until I read the description. It’s almost enough to call for a false flag. (Zsuzsa’s personal philosophy: if the book starts with a disclaimer that all characters are over the age of 18 and consent to these acts, get off the page immediately and clean your browser’s history.)
Note: This book originally appeared in the Dirty Daddies Anniversary Anthology 2019. There has been no additional content added.
Dirty Daddies Anniversary Anthology? Oh, no. So, this is not a romance series, it’s….incest?
Wow, that gives “Dr. Richards’ Littles” a whole new meaning and can I see, I’m totally creeped out?
And you thought you were just getting a poorly made cover.
Bleeaaaccck. That’s some nasty stuff there, bro.
Well, pseudo-incest anyway; Amazon’s a bit schizophrenic with its policies, allowing “taboo” erotica as long as it stays within Amazon’s they’re-all-totally-not-blood-related and everybody’s-at-least-eighteen-by-the-time-the-rumpety-pumpety-starts restrictions. Of course, in this case, I’m thinking the “daddies” in the anthology title might be referring to sugar daddies, which is another matter altogether.
And people think the internet isn’t educational.
Yeah, as I work in the book production biz, I’m aware of the schizophrenia around incest, at Amazon. But the subtitle or the anthology title isn’t Dirty STEP Daddies; it’s Dirty Daddies. Now, sure, it could have just been for alliteration, but it still creeps me out.
I don’t like Woody Allen any better for being an adopted dad, either. I was never a huge fan–the whole NYC-neuroses-faux-Intelligentsia thing was never my go-to for films (having been raised around it–trust me, ain’t that funny), but he is definitely on my “wouldn’t watch unless handcuffed and tied down and my eyelids taped up” category now.
Neither are the titles of two of trashy author Niu White’s “transgressional” bits of erotica Grounded By Step-Daddy nor Step-Daddy’s A Fireman… and yet the “daddies” in question in both pieces are both stated from the start to be step-daddies. You could probably find a thousand more examples of this on Smashwords, and that site doesn’t even prohibit actual incest fiction (though it does “discourage” it). Believe you me, if it’s on Amazon, Daddy in the title means Step-Daddy in anything specifically stated to be erotica… again, unless it means Sugar Daddy.
Is there any way I can distract everyone with something else so that this thread can DIE DIE DIE?
You could always post the latest cover of [Wife of an emperor] [Female name beginning with T].
Anything but that!
ohgoodlord
“Dr. Richards’ Littles” + young, innocent-looking intern + heart-shaped toy-size stethoscope = just plain creepy.
I felt I needed to read the description to find out if it was a YA novel!
Littles? As in adults who pretend to be little kids, or wear diapers?
I think we just discovered what lies below “furries” on the respectability continuum…
Damn you, USA Todaaaaaaaaay!