8 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Hitch
4 years ago

, old son…I’m sorry, but, I really don’t loathe this. Could the font choices have been better? Yes, but lord, kiddo, they coulda been a lot worse, too.

I just don’t think that this one deserves to be here. There’s nothing really wrong with the artwork. (I would have, had it been a project of mine, asked the artist to use some lightening, around the claws, so that they didn’t get lost in the rock, but…hey.) It’s hard, most days, to disagree with your choices, but this one? Not so much an LBC. IMHO, of course.

Hitch
4 years ago
Reply to  Nathan

Compared to what we typically see here? Sure, it’s not sophisticated and it’s hardly commercial, but…I’m sorry, it’s just not the usual level of BAAAD. And the person who drew the were has some skill that will, I tend to think, develop over time. Yes, yes, I know, take away my LBC membership. I suck.

Hitch
4 years ago
Reply to  Nathan

You know, old buddy? It’s entirely possible. I shall have to ward myself against this; I might find myself accepting wholly non-viable cover designs at the office. Zoiks and egad! I don’t think I fully considered the true dangers here….(looks around anxiously…)

Zsuzsa
Zsuzsa
4 years ago

Always hold out for the real Wolfie. Accept no substitutes.

James F. Brown
James F. Brown
4 years ago

And Wolfie’s happy to not pose for this cover.

Davourak
Davourak
4 years ago

Bad font choice as well