What really slays me the most about this, aside from the Curlz, is the pseudo-let’s-appeal-to-the-arty-set mindset, using the faux Oil painting filter in Photoshop. I mean, for crying out loud, why bother?
That is truly Lipstick on a Pig. (Do we have that tag? If not, that’s a moral imperative. #LipstickOnAPig Rules! )
RK@HM
4 years ago
I’m kinda surprised this isn’t from Smashwords; there are probably, like, thousands of books with comparable covers and writing in the Erotica section there.
Thought I’d do my usual “let’s see how far the image has to be stretched in order to get the proportions realistic”: in this case the answer was about 350% – if the picture is stretched to the full height of the page. Doesn’t make it any less ghastly, though.
Everything about that cover screams quality.
Unfortunately, not good quality.
Did she borrow a title from a Family Therapy video at Pornhub?
Ah, Curlz, the third head of the Cerebus of bad font choices, along with Papyrus and Bleeding Cowboys.
Bonus points for making my eyes extra hemmorage with that red on blue vibrating color scheme.
Am I the only one who gets a going-to-the-bathroom vibe from her pants being part way pulled down? It’s certainly not a sexy vibe.
The ass stretch marks are just the nasty icing on this cake.
Nathan, you forgot om-nom de plume!And its tie-in to the title.
I”m just surprised that the author’s first name wasn’t made out to be Wanna.
See, if that had been the case, I’d *definitely* have used the “om-nom-nom de plume” tag.
What really slays me the most about this, aside from the Curlz, is the pseudo-let’s-appeal-to-the-arty-set mindset, using the faux Oil painting filter in Photoshop. I mean, for crying out loud, why bother?
That is truly Lipstick on a Pig. (Do we have that tag? If not, that’s a moral imperative. #LipstickOnAPig Rules! )
I’m kinda surprised this isn’t from Smashwords; there are probably, like, thousands of books with comparable covers and writing in the Erotica section there.
Thought I’d do my usual “let’s see how far the image has to be stretched in order to get the proportions realistic”: in this case the answer was about 350% – if the picture is stretched to the full height of the page. Doesn’t make it any less ghastly, though.