Masters of Deceit

Masters of Deceit

It’s the typography that really, er, sets this apart.

Spread the love
13 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
SironaDanu
7 years ago

Say what?

AlexB
AlexB
7 years ago

I think the title is a work of art. Bloody useless art.

Byline just looks blingy.

dtw
dtw
7 years ago

Not, THAT’S beyond the dancing flames.

Naaman Brown
Naaman Brown
7 years ago

This cover makes me want to resurrect J. Edgar Hoover and tell him they stole your book title, sic ’em!!

seaturtles
seaturtles
7 years ago

i’m pretty sure i just saw the cover guy on mst3k

Grackle
Grackle
7 years ago
Reply to  seaturtles

Haha he looks a bit like the villain from The Final Sacrifice!

seaturtles
seaturtles
7 years ago
Reply to  Grackle

that’s the one!

as bad as that movie is, i’ll always give the actors credit for one thing: being able to say “zap rowsdower” with a straight face.

that takes talent.

Naaman Brown
Naaman Brown
7 years ago
Reply to  seaturtles

Wasn’t that the one made in Canada for $1,500?

seaturtles
seaturtles
7 years ago
Reply to  Naaman Brown

i believe so. and you can see every cent on the screen.

Grackle
Grackle
7 years ago
Reply to  Naaman Brown

Haha I didn’t know that but it does explain a few things.

Frank
Frank
7 years ago

Masters of…poorly-applied eye shadow? Decadrons? Decatur?

Masters of something, anyway.

dtw
dtw
7 years ago
Reply to  Frank

Masters of Fake Lens Flare, I think 🙂

Karl
Karl
7 years ago

I think the “readability” tag should be renamed “readability is for pussies.” That’s clearly the attitude behind titles like this.