Katie’s Crossroads (The 7th Wave): A Christian Romance (Solomon’s Woods Book 2)
Included mostly because of the oddly specific wall art.
Katie’s Crossroads (The 7th Wave): A Christian Romance (Solomon’s Woods Book 2)
Included mostly because of the oddly specific wall art.
Is she trying to will him away or have sex with her?
to fit her expression, a script –
exasperated voiceover: How many times do I have to remind him, not to park his butt on my desk, lest a client show up early?
more from the script:
Hunter: Why the long face?
Katie: I’m played by Sarah Jessica Parker.
Is the picture a reference to the guy’s name being Hunter or something…? Also:
“Hunter Campbell’s marriage ended when his wife deserted him for another man. He’s attracted to Katie Hardinger, and his mom and little boys are too.”
Wow, is THAT what “Christian Romance” means??
Ew! An incestuous, pedophilic, multi generational multi partner relationship? No wonder she looks nauseated.
Plus I can’t help noticing that the bridge in the picture is too thin at the top to hold the weight of all those horses.
That description is hilarious. Grackle and Lydia should write Description Critiques. Wait…I see it now…DescriptionAndBlurbCritics.com! A brainchild is born!
I would go there. Maybe call it Covercopy Critiques.
No more than
means that Adam Tyler was thinking “Really? I should marry my own little 6-year-old? I’d never even remotely considered that a possibility, but now that I think of it…”
Of course, if that was the only line of the description you read, you could be forgiven for thinking that was what it meant; just as you could be forgiven for wondering how it could be legal to sell this book at all after looking at the cover. (Fun fact: I bought a copy of this book just to freak people out by saying “Yes, that book does exist, and I can prove it!”)
I believe that stock art photo (tag: just a daddy and his girl) and the cover that used it (Vivian Leiber, “One Sexy Daddy”, Harlequin American Romance) were used as examples of false flagging or “what were they thinking” unintentionally including elements that appeared to be “code” or “tells” for something else. So both cover artists and blurb writers need independent review to avoid false flagging.
It’s just awful in every possible false, or real, flag. Didn’t anyone at Harlequin LOOK at the damned book? (I nearly put quotation marks around “look” or “anyone” or….but then I figured, newcomers that read these later mightn’t get the in-joke….)
Photobombing fox!
(Naw, foxie’s just hiding under the bridge from the hunters.)
(Or, foxie is springing from Katie’s head.)
In the background painting we have hunters and fox.
In the foreground we have Hunter and fox (Katie).
This is one complicated cover.
Deciphering it is like peeling layers from an onion.
Important note: if you have to say “A Christian Romance” right there on the cover, your book’s a guaranteed failure already.