![cover[1]](https://lousybookcovers.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/cover150.jpg)
I’ve got a great idea. How about you slap the title on the only part of the cover with discernible details?
| Should this cover be in the Lousies? |
I’ve got a great idea. How about you slap the title on the only part of the cover with discernible details?
| Should this cover be in the Lousies? |
There are details under there?
Hands. I see hands!
Not just hands, Jazz Hands!
Well, I suppose it could be a cavern or a city in the dark. A totally dark cover could technically convey the same thing, and cause less confusion.
I sympathize with the city; I’m completely in the dark too.
Pass.
Wow. That was a really silly choice of layout (read stupid).
The best part of the criticism is that nobody realizes that it’s a famous Goya work. Failblog.
Congratulations, Black Hand, on your ability to identify works of art misappropriated by authors. Or your ability to click on the link to Amazon and peek inside. As for me, Goya is a company that puts beans in cans. Weep for my ignorance.
Goya is public domain, so misappropriated is a misapplication of the word. For a den of hipsters, you’d think the poseur peanut gallery would hold a better formal education.