![cover[1]](https://lousybookcovers.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/cover119.jpg)
“Hey, some people might think that having both the title and the title’s initials on the cover is redundant.”
“It’s okay, I’ll make the initials practically unreadable.”
“Hey, some people might think that having both the title and the title’s initials on the cover is redundant.”
“It’s okay, I’ll make the initials practically unreadable.”
Is that Dennis the Menace laughing at the oil slick he left for Mr. Wilson? Dennis, dude–that’s revealing but not very anonymous.
Unfortunately, people like you think they are funny. This is one of the most creative covers on the market today! Stop behaving like a menace yourself and embrace another’s creativity!
If your book is not an expose of environmental contamination caused by flagrant illegal dumping of petrochemicals, I humbly apologize for any confusion.
Um… WTH?
The cover has more meaning than your comment! Sad that ignorant people don’t take the time to pay attention to the cover instead of just insulting it! By the way, the inside is great!
At first glance I thought the initials were “R.O.T.C.”
Me too!
Gad, this is awful.
I don’t know, I thinks its edgy and hip, certainly different.
Maybe you should put on your glasses.
Maybe you should get a new pair of glasses! The cover is seen beautifully through my glasses.
Thanks for the clarification, Nathan. My first reading of this cover had me wondering what an anonymous ROTA is. (Or a non-anonymous ROTA, for that matter.)
Ever think that the person looking back was the anonymous woman trying to become alive? And perhaps the acronym ROTA has more meaning than your little mind can wrap around. Try looking inside and maybe the contents will make you aware, if you understand what that means!
Aaand of the six positive comments on this cover in quick succession, five of them come from the same IP address. I mean, come on — “One of the most creative covers on the market today?” Really? REALLY?
And this gem: “Try looking inside and maybe the contents will make you aware.” Hint: If one needs to read the book in order to appreciate the cover, YOU’RE DOING IT WRONG.
But by all means, feel free to keep not learning from public reaction. Sock-puppeting is what all REAL visionary authors do, after all.
C’mon, Nathan,
Give this sock puppet, uh, I mean “person” the benefit of the doubt. The cover is clearly the result of some serious brain damage (and I know braid namage). I believe the author of all these upbeat and not-at-all belittling comments must be suffering from Dissociative identity disorder.
Max, Jane, Steve, Bobbie, and David are most likely personalities the writer has been forced to create to protect him/herself from the pain of big mean bullies like you and every other critic on this sick, perverse website.
And reality.
Yeah, you know, it’s one thing if an author wants to open a dialogue here. We’ve all seen it before. Some are grateful, some a bit miffed but induced to realize maybe they took a wrong turn. Still others are outright nasty like we had lately. (Yikes.)
It’s ones like we see commenting above, them and/or their rellies, who seem the most bereft and ignorant about what they’ve put out into the world: Look inside! Read and you’ll understand! It’s a thing o’ beauty!
Well, a cover’s got to induce us to look inside (not what’s on the inside induces us to see the cover, duh), and if it fails to do that, it fails in its one primary job.
Opinion here suggests this cover is not up to its task, dear author (and minions). Learn from that and see from a direction other than the one beaming out your own, erm, ego.