10 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Lucie Le Blanc
Lucie Le Blanc
10 years ago

Transparencies: no for everyone, it would seem…

Kris
Kris
10 years ago

So much is wrong here. Photobombing face. See-through people. Impossible wing placement. Wimpy sword (and wimpy arms). *sigh*

ASwan
ASwan
10 years ago
Reply to  Kris

I saw those wings and they reminded me of something I wore during a Christmas pageant.

Tia
Tia
10 years ago

Why the need to make things transparent? Are the trees so important that they must be visible even through people?

red
red
10 years ago

With the amount of see-through stuff on this cover, it smacks of a commercial for the “Victor’s Secret” TV special.

ASwan
ASwan
10 years ago

Okay, I have an honest question. I get why many of the transparencies on this site really truly don’t work. Is there such a thing as one that does look good?

Sirona
10 years ago

I sold a cover recently that had red gem hearts on top of lace. I applied transparency so you could see the lace through them, like you might expect. As for transparent people? Only reason would be if they’re ghosts. I don’t think the two on this cover are ghosts!

scott colbert
scott colbert
10 years ago

Cover art was not part of this knowledge, it seems.

LydiaFCG
LydiaFCG
10 years ago

Remove the floating head.

john e. . .
10 years ago
Reply to  LydiaFCG

Preferably with that sword, Mr. Angel.