Miss?

cover[1]

Miss?

Your eyes to not deceive you. This was drawn on lined paper.

Spread the love
7 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Sirona
10 years ago

Yes. Miss. No “?” needed. Utterly, completely, thoroughly, entirely, miss. That is where “miss” = FAIL!

The author’s last name sounds like she’s choking. McHargue-bargle-gagg-retch.

Lucie Le Blanc
Lucie Le Blanc
10 years ago

LOL Let’s continue playing with the title! (Sometimes they make it really too easy for us…)

“Did you miss those lines. missy?”

Take Cover
Take Cover
10 years ago

“Miss?” ? As in, “Miss? Check out this drawing of my penis.”?

Sue
Sue
10 years ago

So when will the real illustrator work up the final art from this sketch?
What’s that you say, this IS he final art?
Miss!

Nancy
Nancy
10 years ago

Yes, it’s a miss as a cover.

Nice drawing, better than anything I could come up with. (Like to see my stick figures? They are stellar, lol!)

Not for a cover, though.

Try again.

LydiaFCG
LydiaFCG
10 years ago
Reply to  Nancy

I like the drawing too. Has a lot of personality. Don’t know if its appropriate for cover art. That might depend on the genre, but I can’t tell what it is from this cover.

Robbie
Robbie
10 years ago

I’m guessing it’s a British work. “Miss” is the title given to a female schoolteacher, and “Miss?” is how a student would ask for attention from the teacher.

So the lined school paper is probably very appropriate. But it would have been better if the whole cover was done as a sheet of lined paper with an obvious student’s doodling on it — that could have worked well with the story theme.