7 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Kris
10 years ago

I agree! It’s a cool painting. But the cartoon cat silhouettes, the unimaginative fonts, bright colors, and the harsh lines completely destroy the mood. Ick.

Waffles
Waffles
10 years ago

It would be better if the art wasn’t duplicated like that in the title as well.

scott colbert
scott colbert
10 years ago

Book 5? There were four others?!? *weeps*

LydiaFCG
LydiaFCG
10 years ago

Yeah, start with getting rid of the extraneous animals. Cats should not be added as an afterthought to justify the title. A better font and no annoying purple lines are the second step. Like Nathan and Kris said, nice art, but I dont like the way the cover is executed.

Sirona
10 years ago

The art’s gorgeous. But why does part of it repeat at the top behind the title? Shameful waste of lovely art.

john e. . .
10 years ago

I thought this going to be a sequel to the musical . . .

Robbie
Robbie
10 years ago

The double-cat silhouette isn’t bad as a logo, down there at the bottom. I’m guessing it’s the logo for the series. The painting is pretty good.

It’s SO close to being a decent cover. Lose the large cats. Make the top a solid band to match the bottom. Preferably a bit deeper than it is now, which would give the title text more breathing room and bring the eyeline of the painting a little further down. Maybe make the bottom band a bit narrower — the information is floating around a bit. And you’d have something quite reasonable.