HA! I barely noticed the author name under the title, and totally missed it repeated at the bottom. Very strange, but if you’re daring enough to peek at the “look inside”, you’ll understand. This guy really needed to look at other books.
Kregger
8 years ago
I’m pretty sure it is illegal to deface US currency.
My first encounter with stage money was when I saw “Them!” and asked an adult why there was Monopoly money in the cash register of the store in the movie.
Seems the law designed to hinder counterfeiting was interpreted to ban any photographic reproduction of currency. As though counterfeiters could use film frames to make printing plates (in the fifties I got into trouble questioning the wisdom and rightness of my elders).
But back on topic, I suspect they defaced a photographic image of a bill. Who in this “economic recovery” would deface real currency?
I’d also appreciate a colon in the title.
Speakin’ of, why is the author’s name repeated, hand-written (I think?) at the very bottom of the cover? Is that a cover design credit?
HA! I barely noticed the author name under the title, and totally missed it repeated at the bottom. Very strange, but if you’re daring enough to peek at the “look inside”, you’ll understand. This guy really needed to look at other books.
I’m pretty sure it is illegal to deface US currency.
I was waiting for that comment.
My first encounter with stage money was when I saw “Them!” and asked an adult why there was Monopoly money in the cash register of the store in the movie.
Seems the law designed to hinder counterfeiting was interpreted to ban any photographic reproduction of currency. As though counterfeiters could use film frames to make printing plates (in the fifties I got into trouble questioning the wisdom and rightness of my elders).
But back on topic, I suspect they defaced a photographic image of a bill. Who in this “economic recovery” would deface real currency?
Nathan for the win!
Yeah definitely needs a better cover but I actually read this book and its pretty good.