In its Rawest form

cover[1]

In its Rawest form

The ebook so nice, they titled it twice! And digging the black nipple-dot.

Spread the love
4 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jake
Jake
10 years ago

It was a serious act of scholarly research to read that om-nom-de-plum.

Also, that may not be a woman looking up; it may be a gorilla looking down. If it is a woman, I think she’s breathing fire!

Jen
Jen
10 years ago
Reply to  Jake

It was a bit of a challenge but I finally saw the gorilla. I thought it also looked like the chick was breathing fire. Maybe to make up for the hard to discern cover “art” the author decided to print the title twice.

The Rodent
10 years ago

Honestly, this is one of the absolute worst covers I’ve ever seen, even among the bad on this blog! So I just had to read the preview. The book definitely needs an edit and some formatting help, for starters… For other bad covers, see the preview which shows other books by the same author. Based on looking at the preview, the paperback edition formatting totally sucks, too. But I think the prose has some potential, unlike many monstrosities we see here. (Otherwise I wouldn’t comment like this.) [And if the author is reading this, she can feel free to track me down to my lair. I’ll gladly discuss the book and its problems. LOL]

john harvey
john harvey
10 years ago

That black pixel is what makes this more than a book cover.

It is art!!