I’m not sure you could design a good cover for a Price and Prejudice variation in which Darcy and Elizabeth are menaced by the “Nanny-Witch,” but…
I’m not sure you could design a good cover for a Price and Prejudice variation in which Darcy and Elizabeth are menaced by the “Nanny-Witch,” but…
It’s “Pride and Prejudice.”
And the cover still sucks.
No lie. I don’t care if it’s Piece and Prejudice, this cover takes awful to the heights of offal.
I could snark that by typing Price … Nargan had Pride and Prejudice (1813) confused with Fanny Hill (1745). I suspect (a) c and d are close together on the keyboard and (b) Mathan did not proof before hitting [Post]. Lesson for today: Proofread before [Post]. Especially if your a critic like me.
Nathan = Nathan?
your = you’re
Mathan = Nathan?
your = you’re
Stupid autocorrect is responsible for most typos.
I typed pri in my phone txt window and it suggested price so autocorrect could be blamed.
For serious comments I use vedit or notepad so if something appears in my posts, as P.W. Herman would say, I meant to do that.
Perhaps Natman was still suffering from sticker shock after that book of beauty tips.
I once typed a wrong word and a word out of order in the same comment and did not notice it until immediately after clicking the Post button. I actually lost sleep over it! It still haunts me to this day.
(This one here: https://lousybookcovers.com/?p=9883 )
…but if you could, this wouldn’t be it.
You’re all REALLY MEAN!!! Why don’t you find something better to do with your time than criticize hardworking webmasters? [runs off crying]